Showing posts with label junk DNA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label junk DNA. Show all posts
Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Novel features and the evolutionist word-magic flimflam: If you assert it aggressively enough that will make it true.

›
There's a new thread at EvC about how novel features could have evolved , started by Tangle, who is one of the best posters EvC has ever...
Thursday, March 8, 2012

Genetic Evidence of the Bottleneck at Noah's Flood Part 1

›
Well, hi de ho, somebody finally decided to try to have a discussion about the claim that the bottleneck of Noah's Flood should have lef...
2 comments:
Wednesday, March 7, 2012

Evidence for the Super Genome

›
Another new creationist at EvC has claimed that the original genome had to have been much larger than today's, which is of course a nece...
Saturday, March 3, 2012

The Creation Model explains the facts quite nicely

›
We're talking a different whole model here, one that is at least as consistent with the facts as evolutionism. At least. In the creation...
Monday, September 5, 2011

The Genetic Markers of the Flood Bottleneck

›
Here comes JAR with his usual wrongheaded assertions (no, no evidence here) against the Flood of Noah. To mention "fossils" when ...
2 comments:
Saturday, July 23, 2011

Junk DNA supports creationism better than evolutionism

›
There’s a proposal for a new thread at EvC mostly about junk DNA A rising trend among creationists/intelligent design advocates is to imply,...
Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Mutations can't save the cheetah because all they do is kill; most of them kill DNA itself over time

›
Here's another post from that EvC thread where the cheetah example came up that I discuss a couple posts below: This is from creationist...

How the cheetah, living proof that evolution is not possible, becomes just another figment of the evolutionist imagination

›
Hey, I'm honored, mentioned by Iblis in a post at EvC , of course the usual nonsense argument and I'm not there to defend myself but...