The Fantasy of Evolution

Those who find evolution convincing need to rethink it a lot more carefully because the evidence is really not there to the extent you think it is. I suspect you are accepting as evidence all sorts of assumptions, speculations and hypotheses that are not evidence, and are taking most of it on faith in spite of yourself.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

The Genetic Bottleneck challenge to the Flood answered again

›
On the thread at EvC about how a worldwide flood should have left evidence of severe genetic bottleneck in all living things, it is claimed...
Friday, May 25, 2012

Creationists who lose their faith

›
EvC should stick to the evolution-creation debates and leave religion alone, but of course, despite denials, the whole evolutionist framewor...
2 comments:
Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Novel features and the evolutionist word-magic flimflam: If you assert it aggressively enough that will make it true.

›
There's a new thread at EvC about how novel features could have evolved , started by Tangle, who is one of the best posters EvC has ever...
Monday, May 21, 2012

Where Did All the Flood Water Go?

›
Yahoo! Another question answered. Been listening to a discussion on Jan Markel's Understanding the Times radio, on the subject The Top ...
8 comments:

No novel features, no new information, no evolution

›
There is another thread at EvC which is basically about the question of whether evolutionary processes can produce new genetic information, ...
Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Why is "new information" so hard to understand?

›
I don't understand why the concept of genetic information is so difficult and subject to so many odd attempts at defining it. Perhaps I...
Monday, May 7, 2012

A claim that a big effect from "mutation" makes "new information" irrelevant Pt.2

›
I have a second response to that thread at EvC I discussed in the previous post. That is, if we assume, as the evolutionists do, that human...
‹
›
Home
View web version
Powered by Blogger.