WHY DON'T YOU GUYS LEARN WHAT CREATIONISTS ACTUALLY THINK?

You're always screaming at us to learn something (then it turns out I already know as much geology as applies to the topics in hand and more anyway), but you argue nothing but straw men. What a bust of a debate!!!

Perhaps it should be pointed out again, for the benefit of Chuck77, that the seashells in question are not "on top of mountains", but rather IN the mountain tops. It should also be noted that none of the species represented are currently extant. Moreover, many of the species represented are Ammonites, an extinct subclass of the Cephalopoda. The youngest example of an Ammonite fossil has been reliably dated to 65.5 million years. That's about 10 million years before the Indian tectonic plate collided with the Asian plate and scraped up the bottom of the Tethys Sea to the top of the Himalayas. Thus, 10 million year old fossils were scraped up some 7 miles, from the bottom of a sea to the top of the Himalayas. And yet, creationists would have us believe that this happened in a single year.

NO WE DO NOT! Creationists DO NOT believe that MOUNTAIN BUILDING HAPPENED DURING THE YEAR OF THE FLOOD!

OR IF SOME DO THEN YOU NEED TO QUOTE THEM AND REFERENCE THEM.

And poor Chuck77 may not know that the sea fossils are IN the strata that make up the mountain top, BUT MOST CREATIONISTS DO!

AND IF YOU KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT WE BELIEVE YOU'D KNOW THAT THE EXTINCT CREATURES IN THE "FOSSIL RECORD" ARE REGARDED BY US AS CREATURES THAT LIVED BEFORE THE FLOOD AND DIED IN THAT FLOOD. SHEESH!

AND YOUR DATING ASSERTIONS ARE NOTHING BUT QUESTION-BEGGING AS WE DO NOT ACCEPT THEM.